Sunday, September 8, 2013

Summary of End of Butler's Parable of the Sower (as of 9 p.m. 9/8)

BIBLE REFERENCES
Ryan: “The book ends with a parable from the Bible which suggests that Lauren and Earthseed will succeed. Although there is no concrete evidence that they succeed, I believe that the group has enough drive to create a community that is livable in the circumstances dealt.”
Dana: “I loved the connection to the Bible at the end of the book. Where the seeds landed in the good ground, they grew; just like how the group landed on the good land and they decided to make it home. After reading the end I realized that the world in the book was still lost and in danger. There still was no turn around in the future.”
Chad: “As I was reading this I wondered why Butler titled the book Parable of the Sower. Further investigation revealed that this is also the title of one Jesus’s parables. In this particular parable a sower drops a seed among rocks and thorns, and yet despite the adverse conditions the seed grows and is able to bear a plethora of fruit. The parallels between this parable and Butler’s novel are apparent. Therefore the very title presages the fate of Earthseed which will only continue to proliferate as the novel progresses and more people are persuaded by Lauren’s ideas.”
Christian: “Is it immoral to kill? If so, why does God command it so many times in the Bible, David and Goliath, Joshua and Jericho, Samson with jawbone of an ass? In the Old Testament, there are a lot of actions with the death penalty attached. If a person carries out these sentences, is he violating the 6th commandment? I believe there has to be a difference between killing as used throughout the Bible, and the killing referred to in [the 6th commandment]‘thou shalt not kill.’…the Hebrew word ‘ratsach,’ used for ‘kill’ in the 6th commandment…means ‘murder’ rather than ‘kill.’…Kill: ‘to deprive of life in any manner; cause the death of; slay.’ Murder: ... ‘committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation…” …what does it mean to ‘kill’? Taken most literally, this would forbid killing animals for food or even plants for food. That seems implausible, however, because the Hebrew Scriptures contain extensive descriptions about how to properly go about killing for food... More significantly is the fact that there are many examples in the Old Testament of God commanding the Hebrews to kill their enemies — why would God do that if this were a violation of one of the Commandments? Thus, many translate the original Hebrew word ratsach as ‘murder’ instead of ‘kill.’ …In fact, many Jews regard [other translations]… of the text as ‘kill’ to be immoral in and of itself, both because it falsifies the words of God and because there are times when one has an obligation to kill.”

EARTHSEED
Jacob: “A lot of Earthseed reminded me of the philosopher Heraclitus… This Heraclitus quote, ‘everything is in flux and nothing abides / everything flows and nothing stays fixed / everything is constantly changing and nothing stays the same,’ sounds very similar to several Earthseed poems.” 
Kasey: “I still think Lauren is the only one who will practice her Earthseed religion and believe in it. Nobody else seemed like they seriously were intrigued enough to just stop believing their religion and switch.”
Chad: “Parable of the Sower concluded in much the way I envisioned; with Lauren and her modest group locating a remote sanctuary from which the idea of Earthseed can disseminate further…. What was most satisfying to me in the conclusion was how Lauren devised a ceremony in which everyone could mourn for the dead. This felt to me most appropriate because it embodied a new beginning for not only the group, but perhaps the world (considering the advent of Earthseed)….”
Michael W.: “The people in the group are also beginning to accept the ideas of Earthseed. This is something that I wasn’t sure was going to happen, as many people cannot look past the religions that already exist.”
Nicole: “Earthseed is often questioned and challenged by the people Lauren is traveling with. Her ideas seem too simple to Bankole and possibly complex to another…. I see Earthseed as a safe haven, all over the world people pray to their God to make them feel better about a situation or give them forgiveness. I know for me as a child I would often ask myself, how can God let terrible things happen in the world? How can he just sit back and watch people suffer and die? Earthseed on the other hand does not see God as a person but more as a force… this idea is easier to swallow. Morals are challenged throughout the entire story, is it okay to steal from the dead? Is it okay to kill? …is it okay to throw away your morals as long as it helps you survive? The group refuses to kill humans for food or any other reason besides self defense. Their main goal is to survive, though they will only go as far and killing to save one another and stripping the dead. As a reader you hear about scavengers killing people and stealing, Lauren and the rest see this as wrong. As readers living in 2013 we see killing at all as a sin. So the question is, when does it become okay to kill, or to take what is not yours? How desperate do you have to be?” 

BANKOLE’S LAND
Jacob: “Although I wasn’t expecting Bankole’s land to be everything they may have expected it to be, I did not expect it to be completely destroyed. They survived all they survived only for a place where they might, if their lucky, be able to survive…
Gabby: “…I couldn’t feel completely hopeless, because of course Lauren in no way gave up.  She immediately thought that the group could stay there, grow food and become a community.  She convinced everyone that they could stay safe with dogs and night watches, and make money by selling food… I’m almost happy that the book ended this way, not as I had hoped… this book proved to be what it always seemed to be, real. Octavia Butler only wrote what she thought could be, not what others wanted to be. She wrote of all the harsh truths, that could in fact exist, if we let the world go on as it is...” 
Rebecca: “I was expecting rolling, lush hills, with houses and opportunities to work and start a normal life. I guess something more like a ‘normal’ community. I was not expecting what it actually was like. I was astonished to say the least. And I was even more surprised that they decided to stay there and start a community called Acorn.”
Andrew: “I was a little let down at the end of the book, but only a little…. The group finally turns things around again and [they] have a plan for their community and Butler ends the book with Bankole saying that he doesn’t think they will succeed there and Lauren telling him that they have work to do…”
Kaitlyn: “Personally, I hated the ending of this book. We don’t know of anything definite that happens to anyone. The only thing we do know is that Jill died. Knowing that they went to Bankole’s land and are planning to start their Earthseed community, isn’t enough for me…. there were many questioning parts in the book. For example, when seeing a couple together like Bankole and Lauren, is that something that is normal in this dystopia? Are there more people outside of the Earthseed group that have Lauren's sharing? And whatever did happen to Curtis?”
Jenny: “While I was reading the book, I kept asking myself, how far have they come? Will anyone else die? My question was answered when Jill was killed, but at least she died saving a little girl’s life. I was surprised to learn that other people have hyperempathy and I found it ironic that the two little girls, Emery and Mora, found Lauren…. I also wondered, does Lauren actually like Bankole? Or did she feel left out because everyone else had a partner. The fact that Lauren had a little family by the end of the book made me hopeful that Earthseed and Lauren’s dreams will come true…. Personally, I think that Earthseed with flourish and it was a smart decision to stay at Bankole’s house.”

DECLINE OF CERTAIN AUTHORITIES
Chad: One subject addressed in this section of the book that I found particularly provocative was the complete apathy of the authorities (that is the police)…. it seems that even the authorities have devolved into marauding bands likely to bring you harm rather than provide any meaningful assistance. I think after reading this section the feeling [of] impotence Lauren and her group must have had really crystallized in my mind.”

MORAL OF THE STORY
Alex: “Why did Butler write this novel? That is one of the reoccurring questions we have tried to answer in class…. I have come up with a theory that developed because I believe that this is the direction that Butler sees the world going and this novel is her way of telling the audience to pay attention to the world and what we are doing to it. Though this dystopia seems unlikely to us now, it is always a possibility. Since we have not reached the point where resources are low [enough] we don’t know how we will react to it if it was to happen. I believe that the reoccurring theme of community is Butler’s way of telling us that in disaster we need to stick together and help others to survive. If we don’t stick together we will end up like the people on the road who try to travel alone and end up meeting terrible fates. But if we do stick together we can power through bad situations and make it to a better place.”




No comments:

Post a Comment